By Sarah Snell Cooke, Principal, Cooke Consulting Solutions
Marijuana banking has been a controversial issue among credit unions, regulators and legislators, as well as consumers. Given the current conservative, anti-marijuana Attorney General Jeff Sessions, credit unions have been curious whether this is a business from which they want to toke. Federal law makes marijuana use and therefore its dispensaries illegal, however, a handful of states have legalized it and related businesses are seeing green.
Joseph Barton of the law firm Sheppard Mullin in Los Angeles—California is one of the states marijuana is legal—has said there are some strong indicators that this area of enforcement is becoming laxer. “I think he’s going to take action, not how people think,” Barton said of AG Sessions. “He’s not going to come after you because of marijuana.” He postulated that Sessions will likely ramp up auditing efforts through the IRS.
While the public attitude has mellowed regarding ganja, Barton pointed out, “Nobody likes a tax cheat.” Sessions can use that as a backdoor into the Mary Jane’s businesses. He said word is the IRS is bogarting auditors, but so long as credit unions’ paperwork is all in order regarding the pot businesses it serves, there shouldn’t be a problem.
Wanna chill with the Underground? Learn more here.
Here are the indicators Barton said show the business might be becoming less risky for credit unions:
We’re hosting another Underground Collision at the World Council of Credit Unions' Annual Conference in Singapore. If you’d like to join us, click here to drop Sue Mitchell a line.
The best way to begin servicing marijuana-related businesses is to start slowly and build compliance as you go, Barton advised. Get to know your member through comprehensive due diligence. Include detailed covenants re: compliance with state laws. Mandate detailed supporting document for every transaction—this is critical for your Suspicious Activity Reports and Currency Transaction Reports, and lastly, comply with all federal reporting requirements. Alternatively, credit unions might consider working with parent entities of MRB subsidiaries and affiliates but not their marijuana-related enterprises.
There’s always a small chance, Barton said, that you could be charged with aiding and abetting if your policies are not strong or not followed, but the fact a credit union has knowledge of a marijuana business makes for a very slim case. Pot-serving credit unions may also attract extra attention from FinCEN, so be prepared. For example, simply setting up initial policies might cost $20,000-$30,000, and internal human resources for expertise might require another $100,000 each. No excuses or lesser compliance just because a credit union is small either, because herb is illegal under federal law. Compliance costs are huge, but the reward can be, too. Based on his research, Barton said revenue for these businesses could be around $10 million to $15 million per month, which means a lot of demand for financial services. And they’ll pay for it.